[erlang-questions] My biggest beef with Erlang
Mon Nov 26 22:36:48 CET 2007
On 26/11/2007, Robert Virding <> wrote:
> Scheme allows defining a prefix within the a symbol which means it refers
> to another module (library for them) so you would write:
> (mod:func ... )
> when you know where to go at compiletime. At least that's how I
> interpreted the spec. Then for the general case you could use:
> (apply mod 'func ( ... ))
> or how about:
> (: mod func arg1 arg2 ... )
> for all cases?
Equivalent to funcall in CL, this would be a remote funcall. Again a bit
heavy for the standard case.
Of course some mailers might see that as a smiley. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions