[erlang-questions] Erlang math libraries

[jm]

Jay Anderson wrote:

> This does indeed have vector and matrix operations, but not for the general
> case. (I was pleasantly surprised however by how easy it was to understand their
> code. Perhaps that's a tribute to erlang.) I'd want to do much larger matrix
> operations. Any thoughts on how to represent a matrix with erlang? (dense or
> sparse) Would a list of lists be good enough or would there be a better way?
> 

I'd sneek a look at how lisp or haskell handle matrices to get some ideas.

Jeff.