[erlang-questions] Erlang math libraries

jm <>
Wed May 16 05:52:27 CEST 2007


Jay Anderson wrote:

> This does indeed have vector and matrix operations, but not for the general
> case. (I was pleasantly surprised however by how easy it was to understand their
> code. Perhaps that's a tribute to erlang.) I'd want to do much larger matrix
> operations. Any thoughts on how to represent a matrix with erlang? (dense or
> sparse) Would a list of lists be good enough or would there be a better way?
> 

I'd sneek a look at how lisp or haskell handle matrices to get some ideas.

Jeff.



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list