[erlang-questions] some language changes

James Hague james.hague@REDACTED
Tue Jun 5 15:52:20 CEST 2007

> I thought the aim was a NICE syntax?

My aim was simply to list of bunch of suggestions that have come up on
erlang-questions in the past, and to indicate that most of them are
already supported at the BEAM level.

If someone wanted to write another language on top of BEAM, one with
support for Erlang concurrency constructs, it's certainly doable.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list