[erlang-questions] some language changes

Mike McNally <>
Mon Jun 4 22:18:30 CEST 2007

> The only clean way to do that would be to introduce proper variable 
> scoping, but that is a big change, both syntax and semantics.

As one of the original people to freak out at the suggestion, I'll
echo poor Mr. Hague's clarification that he was indeed discussing
a fairly radical set of changes, in the form of what amounts to a
new language.

[ I love pre-moistened towelettes ] Mike McNally -- 

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list