[erlang-questions] some language changes

James Hague james.hague@REDACTED
Sat Jun 2 22:28:49 CEST 2007

> > * destructive updates of local variables (that is, removing the
> > single-assignment property)
> AAAAA!!!!!!   Absolutely no.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with it.  It's exactly the same as:

A = A
A1 = A + B
A2 = A1 + 5

etc., but less ugly.  And it's easy to do in BEAM while still avoiding
destructive updates of *data structures*.  People have requested this
in Erlang before, and the main problem that it conflicts with the
semantics of pattern matching.  But BEAM supports it just fine.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list