[erlang-questions] surprising integer (external) encoding
Wed Jul 4 09:12:22 CEST 2007
term_to_binary( 16#7FFFFFF ) produces <<131,98,7,255,255,255>>
term_to_binary( 16#7FFFFFF ) does *not* produce <<131,98,8,255,255,255>>
whish is encoding for big numbers.
Out of curisosty:
Q1: Why 2^27 values only? It is more intuitive to expect 2^31, and leave
only one bit (as opposed to 5) for sign (second complement) encoding.
Q2: Big numbers are encoded using little endian encoding, however lengths
indicating the number are encoded using big-endian (well, this becomes
obvious only for large enough numbers). Any particular reason? Or is it just
a question of more Haiku?
More information about the erlang-questions