[erlang-questions] Lisp syntax for Erlang

[Robert Virding]

On 07/12/2007, Matthew Dempsky <matthew@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> On 12/6/07, Robert Virding <rvirding@REDACTED> wrote:
> > This seems to be more a system for defining libraries then an inclusive
> > module system as in Erlang, the top program is not in a module.
>
> I'm not familiar with the trainwreck-called-R6RS, but that statement
> is not true for Scheme 48's module system.
>

You don't like the new standard? It has certainly grown.

Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20071207/e752677d/attachment.htm>