[erlang-questions] Reply-to, was Starting the Erlang VM in a new thread

Jeremy Thurgood <>
Wed Aug 29 16:58:15 CEST 2007


Michael Campbell wrote:
> On 8/29/07, Samuel Tesla <> wrote:
>> (Aplogies to Joel to whom I sent this directly already, I forgot to
>> Reply-To-All...need coffee.)
> 
> ...or a list that has a default reply-to as the list.   Why does this
> list NOT do that?  It's certainly uncommon in that regard.

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful

(Replied to list so we don't inundate the poor chap with responses to 
this effect.)

--J



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list