[erlang-questions] Linked-in driver nuances
Wed Aug 29 00:39:24 CEST 2007
Do I correctly understand that the best, simplest or least error-
prone way to proxy GUI objects with a linked-in driver is to have one
port represent one object?
This would require creating a port per object of course but seems to
be easier than trying to have one port manage all objects behind the
Am I right?
More information about the erlang-questions