[erlang-questions] Is it worth commenting this guy?
Tue Aug 28 16:56:48 CEST 2007
Robert Virding writes:
> While I appreciate the references I personally think he is a
> bit bonkers and just not getting it. Do you think it is worth getting into a
> discussion with him and try to correct him where he is wrong? Has anyone
I stumbled across this (from the same author):
| I am willing to stick my neck out and make the following prediction:
| The most revolutionary scientific advances in this century will come
| from the Bible.
| There is no doubt that the discovery of AI, one of the most coveted
| holy grails of modern science, will be shocking news in its own
| right. The notion that the secret of AI was written down in a book
| nearly two thousand years ago is bound to ruffle many a scientific
| feather. And that the book in question should turn out to be the Bible
| (of all things!) will be more than many can bear. Indeed, why not the
| Koran? Why not the Vedic scriptures? Why did not the secret of AI come
| from Buddhism or Hinduism or some other religion? Most important of
| all, why did it not come from the scientific community seeing that
| they are all so quick to discredit the scientific importance of not
| just the Bible, but all ancient scriptures?
Pretty much all of that is outside my area of expertise.
More information about the erlang-questions