[erlang-questions] Parse-transforming !! to a function call

Mats Cronqvist <>
Fri Aug 24 09:40:49 CEST 2007


On 2007-08-16 10:52, Joe Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
> (Actually we dont use ? any more so we could say A ? B instead of A !! B
>  this might be even better - it saves one character and the ? clearly
>  indicates the intent)

   if only... but as far as i know '?' is munched by the preprocessor.

   also, i think that if anything '?' should be used instead of 
'receive' (the way God, or at least Tony Hoare, intended).

   mats



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list