[erlang-questions] Parse-transforming !! to a function call
Fri Aug 24 09:40:49 CEST 2007
On 2007-08-16 10:52, Joe Armstrong wrote:
> (Actually we dont use ? any more so we could say A ? B instead of A !! B
> this might be even better - it saves one character and the ? clearly
> indicates the intent)
if only... but as far as i know '?' is munched by the preprocessor.
also, i think that if anything '?' should be used instead of
'receive' (the way God, or at least Tony Hoare, intended).
More information about the erlang-questions