[erlang-questions] Name For This Pattern?
David Mercer
dmercer@REDACTED
Tue Aug 21 16:55:54 CEST 2007
On Monday, August 20, 2007 at 19:45, Ludovic Coquelle wrote:
There is a section in SICP about streams (
http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-24.html#%_sec_3.5).
Neat-o. I gave away my copy of that book 19 years ago when I finished with
the course. I don't remember a thing about that book other than that it was
about Scheme. To me, the course was learn-Scheme-to-get-an-A, but I always
thought the professors were trying to get at something more profound, I just
didn't care. Get my A and get out of there. Now that I'm older, I bet a
reread of the text would probably be more meaningful. Thanks for the link.
For other erlang related code, there is an implementation in user
contribution of trapexit, and I wrote a very simple one too
http://khigia.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/44/ (the end contains few links which
could interest you).
That's a pretty good link, too. For the lazy among you, I think the
Trapexit link being referred to is
http://forum.trapexit.org/viewtopic.php?t=6591.
On Tuesday, August 21, 2007 at 08:04, Joe Armstrong wrote:
Another *completely different* way to represent lazy lists is as processes
That's the way I probably would do it in real life Erlang. (So if you
stumble across this thread and thought to copy my way, consider Joe's
first.) I was going for more the brain-bending exercise of doing this
functionally. The catch with a process is that it does not get
automatically garbage collected: would have to kill it manually.
Thanks.
Cheers,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20070821/c3c26550/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list