[erlang-questions] : Kill a process tree
Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
ulf.wiger@REDACTED
Mon Apr 23 14:44:43 CEST 2007
That's why I didn't suggest it in the first place.
But later posts suggested that this was for a test
function, in which case I thought it might be
acceptable... or at least a little bit less evil. (:
BR,
Ulf W
> -----Original Message-----
> From: erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED
> [mailto:erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED] On Behalf Of
> Mats Cronqvist
> Sent: den 23 april 2007 14:27
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] : Kill a process tree
>
> June Kim wrote:
> >
> > I think I have to consider Ulf's advice: trace.
>
> congratulations to a a truly evil scheme.
> be aware though that you will (likely) no longer be able
> to use tracing to debug with.
>
> mats
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list