[erlang-questions] : Kill a process tree

Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <>
Mon Apr 23 14:44:43 CEST 2007


That's why I didn't suggest it in the first place.
But later posts suggested that this was for a test
function, in which case I thought it might be 
acceptable... or at least a little bit less evil. (:

BR,
Ulf W 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  
> [mailto:] On Behalf Of 
> Mats Cronqvist
> Sent: den 23 april 2007 14:27
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] : Kill a process tree
> 
> June Kim wrote:
> > 
> > I think I have to consider Ulf's advice: trace.
> 
>    congratulations to a a truly evil scheme.
>    be aware though that you will (likely) no longer be able 
> to use tracing to debug with.
> 
>    mats
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list