[erlang-questions] Good Erlang style?

[t ty]

The theory helps but is not needed. What is your actual background ?

t

On 9/18/06, norbertk <Norbert.Klamann@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>
> Guest wrote:
>
> I've felt a bit daunted as I've dabbled into FP languages - it seems
> to be a field where a lot of academic research occurs (perhaps due to
> the lack of side effects?) and as I've had no CS formal education
> (yet) I sometimes have trouble following what's happening in some of
> the papers I read; ACM papers are a prime example.
>
> (end of quote)
>
> Yes, that is a problem for me too. I have the feling that these languages have a lot of practical value, but is is hard to come by without the theoretical background. defmacro.rg is very valuable because it presents the thinking of FP in a language which is understandable for programmers in vonventional languages.
>
>
> Norbert
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>  Post recived from mailinglist[/quote]
> _________________________________________________________
> Post sent from http://www.trapexit.org
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>