scope of variables
Mon Sep 4 10:14:44 CEST 2006
On 9/4/06, Richard Carlsson <> wrote:
> and perhaps define macros that use such lambdas:
> -define(let(X, Y, Z), ((fun (X)-> Z end)(Y))).
Is it really that simple? This doesn't make for hygienic macros, and
this will fail with a badmatch:
A = 2,
?let(X, 3, begin A=1, X+A end).
> There is of course a small cost for the lambda application, but you
> might be able to get rid of most of that by using -compile(inline).
Oh, so even anonymous funs can be inlined? That's interesting!
More information about the erlang-questions