[erlang-questions] Was Re: Bug ?! now Erlang comment (LONG LONG)
Thu Oct 26 18:13:04 CEST 2006
Dominic Williams wrote:
> However, I do find that backward compatibility is too often
> offered as a reason not to make some changes, particularly
> of the kind that correct past mistakes. As a result, Erlang
> is growing, but not cleaned up.
> I think the solution is to offer, along with the changes,
> refactoring tools to bring existing code up to date.
I very much agree with the comments of Dominic.
In the (not so distant) past, I've seen a certain reluctance to clean up Erlang and I was never particularly convinced by the arguments which were offered to explain this reluctance.
really long time before they are made default. There is still no option to disallow two-tuples as funs.
More information about the erlang-questions