[erlang-questions] Process declarations
Wed Oct 25 14:45:16 CEST 2006
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joe Armstrong wrote:
> Process declarations:
> Do away with spawn. Replace with a process keyword:
> So that we can name processes. Things without names we cannot talk about.
I think this is a bad idea because it's moving away from the capability
model, where posession of a pid implies permission to communicate with it,
and if you don't have the pid you can't. The pid *is* the name. Also, I'm
not sure how your proposal deals with multiple processes running the
f.a.n.finch <> http://dotat.at/
HEBRIDES: NORTHEAST 5 OR 6 VEERING EAST 6 OR 7 PERHAPS GALE 8 LATER. SHOWERS
THEN RAIN. MODERATE OR GOOD.
More information about the erlang-questions