[erlang-questions] Package Support/Use

Bengt Kleberg bengt.kleberg@REDACTED
Fri Nov 3 07:28:19 CET 2006


On 2006-11-02 21:19, James Hague wrote:
> On 11/2/06, Chandru <chandrashekhar.mullaparthi@REDACTED> wrote:
>> I agree. Please let's not have packages. They are so ugly. I hated them when

...deleted
> I also agree.  Packages are pretty in a way, but they're a heavyweight
> solution to a simple problem.
> 
> I would much rather see some effort put into cleaning up the existing
> libraries.  Get rid of all the pre-fun functions that use "apply."

would it be correct to use ''ironic'' to describe the fact that the only 
effort (that i know of), to clean up the existing libraries, uses packages?


bengt
-- 
    EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
    solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
    patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list