[erlang-questions] Never let it fail!

Bob Ippolito <>
Fri Nov 3 04:53:40 CET 2006


On 11/2/06, Jay Nelson <> wrote:
> Here is an alternative to the "let it fail" philosophy.  They take the
> opposite tack.
>
> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/wcook/Drafts/2006/RinardOOPSLA06.pdf
>
> This was presented at OOPSLA 2006.
>

Fail fast + supervisor restart seems like it's pretty much equivalent
to being failure oblivious. Just easier to debug :)

-bob



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list