Field assignments are reordered in record creations

David Hopwood david.nospam.hopwood@REDACTED
Thu May 25 00:32:29 CEST 2006

David Hopwood wrote:
> [1] One problem is that although the standards talk about "previous", "next"
>     and "consecutive" sequence points, the ordering of sequence points is
>     only partial, so it is not clear what these terms really mean. An annex
>     that would have clarified this was dropped in final editing of C99,
>     apparently because the C committee couldn't understand it.

For anyone who is curious about this, see Annex D in
<>. (For historical
interest only -- since it was dropped from the standard, C implementations
are not obligated to follow it.)

David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@REDACTED>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list