Field assignments are reordered in record creations
Thu May 25 00:32:29 CEST 2006
David Hopwood wrote:
>  One problem is that although the standards talk about "previous", "next"
> and "consecutive" sequence points, the ordering of sequence points is
> only partial, so it is not clear what these terms really mean. An annex
> that would have clarified this was dropped in final editing of C99,
> apparently because the C committee couldn't understand it.
For anyone who is curious about this, see Annex D in
<http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2794/n2794.pdf>. (For historical
interest only -- since it was dropped from the standard, C implementations
are not obligated to follow it.)
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@REDACTED>
More information about the erlang-questions