Vlad Dumitrescu vladdu55@REDACTED
Fri Jun 2 08:50:58 CEST 2006

Hi all,

Using epp_dodger is very nice, but the resulting tree is a mixture of
"normal" trees and erl_syntax trees. Because I send these trees to
Java, it would be much easier to have a uniform representation.

Is there any way to force the use of erl_syntax trees everywhere?

I could store the trees on the Erlang side and use rpc to query them
by only using the erl_syntax API, but it feels quite heavyweight
(there will be many more queries than creations) plus that on the Java
side the trees are mutable.

best regards,

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list