how to interpret these results ?

James Hague <>
Fri Jul 21 15:27:42 CEST 2006


I wrote:

> Even so, Erlang often does surprisingy well for algorithms that are
> more than just doing lots of math on a large data set.  Sometimes
> working symbolically with leads to higher-level optimizations.

I get a failing grade for proofreading.  That should be "Sometimes
working symbolically with data leads to..."



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list