Lazy recursive list comprehensions
Fri Jan 13 12:38:41 CET 2006
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> On the other hand, if the lazyness would be hidden somehow in a
> then the use of it could still be elegant. There would be no
> but that's not a big deal.
This was a huge deal for me yesterday when I tried a non-
comprehension version of trans. Couldn't get it to work. Can you show
me what it would look like?
More information about the erlang-questions