[erlang-questions] Heap architecture of current Erlang

Kostis Sagonas <>
Thu Dec 28 14:25:18 CET 2006


Kirill Zaborski wrote:
> Are there any benchmarks showing the difference in real applications?

What do you consider to be a 'real' application?

If by a real application you mean an existing application that has been 
performance-tuned for the private architecture (e.g. by sending only 
small messages and storing the rest of the shared data in an ETS -- in 
other words by simulating the hybrid architecture) then the answer to 
your question is that they are not so many.

If, instead, `real' applications use or adopt a more natural style of 
Erlang programming where they really communicate via message passing, 
then of course you will get a very different view of the benefits that 
the 'hybrid' architecture offers.

> Is this option really useful?

The answer to this question is very subjective.  It's up to individual 
users to decide.  That's why the option is there.

Hope this helps.

Kostis





More information about the erlang-questions mailing list