[erlang-questions] Why is Erlang what it is?

Mats Cronqvist <>
Thu Dec 14 11:03:33 CET 2006


Kirill Zaborski wrote:
> OK, so now meaningful reply from Erlang people.

   i assume you mean "no" instead of "now".

   i'm a bit confused about what you might consider "meaningful". what i tried 
to express was that from ericsson's perspective, the cost of introducing typing 
(huge) is much higher than the perceived benefits (unclear).
   imo, the only thing that could change this is compelling evidence that typing 
would improve ericsson's products.

   mats



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list