[erlang-questions] Why is Erlang what it is?
Wed Dec 13 17:16:11 CET 2006
Kostis Sagonas wrote:
>> On 12/13/06, *Richard Carlsson* <
>> <mailto:>> wrote:
>> Strict typing of Erlang programs is pretty much dead. Type analysis,
>> however, is live and kicking in the "dialyzer" application, from the
>> HiPE project.
> Please pay attention to the details.
> Richard wrote "strict typing" and you changed it to "static typing".
Well, that was of course also wrong of me. Erlang is strictly typed
(with checks at runtime) - i.e., there are no unsafe operations,
but it is not *statically type checked*, which is what I should
More information about the erlang-questions