[erlang-questions] Typed records and erl_parse
Tue Dec 5 11:28:46 CET 2006
On 12/5/06, Tobias Lindahl <Tobias.Lindahl@REDACTED> wrote:
> Short version:
> Who would suffer if we changed the format of the record attribute given
> by erl_parse?
The changes as talked about in this thread I take it?
Is this something erl_parse will accept to parse but throw away? Will
these type annotations spread out in a future to be used in other
places in the erlang language? Perhaps as shorthand for type-guards
when pattern matching?
More information about the erlang-questions