Lisp-Python vs. Erlang (was MLvtA, was Meta)
Fri Aug 25 15:24:11 CEST 2006
On 8/24/06, Jay Nelson <> wrote:
> I think it reads clearer than lisp or python for the following reasons:
> 1) Prolog-like patterns map to the problem domain as a grammar function
> rather than the artificial list/hash map structure. Also the compiler
> can optimize it more easily so clarity plus speed.
> 3) The use of tuples and lists differentiates intent better.
These two are huge, IMO. As much as I appreciate the power of Lisp
and Scheme, once I started using a language with pattern matching I
lost my taste for Lisp. The programs in Norvig's _Paradigm's of AI
Programming_, which are some of the most interesting and powerful
programs in any textbook, are quite unaesthetic, as least to my eye.
Maybe Larry Wall said it best:
"I think in particular of Lisp, which is the most beautiful language
in the world, and every program in lisp is real ugly."
More information about the erlang-questions