fun expressions and abstract forms
Fri Aug 18 06:21:40 CEST 2006
Earlier today, I thought I made a breakthrough for Smerl when I
discovered that erlang:fun_info gives you the abstract form of fun
expressions as well as their closure environment values.
I even added APIs for adding functions using fun expressions:
C = smerl:new(foo),
smerl:add_func(C, bar, fun() -> 1+1 end),
foo:bar(). % return 2
Why did I get excited? Because this API would let Smerl users avoid
writing code snippets or having to know the abstract format.
I actually got everything to work, including embedding closure
variables in the generated functions.
Silly me, I only tested it in the Erlang shell, where everything
Later today, I wrote similar code in a compiled module, and lo and
behold, erlang:fun_info stopped giving me any useful information -- ie
abstract representation -- for fun expressions. This totally broke the
fun expression usage in Smerl.
My question is, is there any way of getting the abstract format for a
fun expression in a compiled module?
(I tried erl_parse:abstract, but it doesn't seem to handle fun
expressions, just basic values.)
Any help is appreciated,
More information about the erlang-questions