Port driver communication witout copy of binaries
Raimo Niskanen
raimo@REDACTED
Wed Aug 16 11:06:06 CEST 2006
Ah!
After spending some time in gdb I can inform you that it is not
a bug, nor your mistake, it is a feature :-)
Since your two binaries are so-called heap binaries, that is
(roughly) binaries smaller than 64 bytes, they are regarded
as list data too. That is because they have no off-heap reference
counted data storage that can be utilised for driver outputv.
If you make any binary larger than 64 bytes it should behave
as you expected.
And, the first vector entry is intenionally left empty for
the driver to use if it wants to add header data, avoiding
to copy the whole ErlIOvec structure to make room for
a header vector entry.
Notes:
There is a possibility that this 64 byte limit may change in any
OTP release, since it is an optimisation parameter.
In general, when using the driver outputv interface, one can not
assume it is possible to maintain structure information from the
erlang I/O-list down to the ErlIOvec data. Both are just
serial data on different forms and the byte order is the
only thing absolutely certain.
Some assumptions are safer than others, though:
* Small data may be concatenated into a common binary.
* A binary that is kept is kept as it is.
So the driver->outputv() code must be prepared to get data
on different forms. The ErlIOvec format is an optimization
to avoid copying and the VM uses it at its own conveniance.
kramer@REDACTED (Reto Kramer) writes:
> Raimo,
>
> I wish I could replicate your outputv result. Perhaps you could help
> me spot my mistake. The example I've added further down (iovec.erl,
> iovec_driver.c and build_iovec) is run on OS X 10.4.7 using R11. gcc
> is 3.3. The port is opened as binary as it should.
>
> $ ./build_iovec
> Erlang (BEAM) emulator version 5.5 [source] [async-threads:32] [hipe]
>
> Eshell V5.5 (abort with ^G)
> 1>ev->vsize 2
> ev-size (total bytes size) 8
> ev->binv[0] = null
> ev->iov[0]->iov_len = 0
> ev->binv[1]->orig_size = 8
> ev->iov[1]->iov_len = 8
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[0] = 1
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[1] = 2
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[2] = 3
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[3] = 4
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[4] = 5
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[5] = 6
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[6] = 7
> ev->iov[1]->iov_base[7] = 8
>
> ^C
>
> In iovec.erl, the following iolist is sent:
> encode() ->
> [1,<<2,3,4>>,5,6|<<7,8>>].
>
> It's really as if I used "output" (instead of "outputv") in that the
> iolist seems to be flattened before handed to the driver (and hence,
> copied, which I wanted to avoid by way of using outputv).
>
> The 2nd puzzle is that the first iov entry is always length 0. This
> is so, even if I pass (encode) just a single binary.
>
> Any sharp eyed comment on iovec_driver.c would be much appreciated.
>
> - Reto
> PS: the async aspect is irrelevant here, I just left it in there
> since this is a trimmed version of a larger driver that is async.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ** iovec_driver.c **
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include "erl_driver.h"
>
> typedef struct {
> ErlDrvPort port;
> } example_data;
>
> typedef struct {
> int res;
> } example_async_data;
>
> typedef void ASYNC_INVOKE(void*);
>
> void async_iovectest(void* async_data) {
> example_async_data* the_data = (example_async_data*)async_data;
> }
>
> static ErlDrvData example_drv_start(ErlDrvPort port, char *buff) {
> example_data* d = (example_data*)driver_alloc(sizeof(example_data));
> d->port = port;
> return (ErlDrvData)d;
> }
>
> static void example_drv_stop(ErlDrvData handle) {
> driver_free((char*)handle);
> }
>
> static void example_drv_outputv(ErlDrvData handle, ErlIOVec *ev) {
> example_data* d = (example_data*)handle;
> example_async_data* the_async_data = driver_alloc(sizeof
> (example_async_data));
> ASYNC_INVOKE* fun;
> printf("\n\r");
> printf("ev->vsize %i\n\r", ev->vsize);
> printf("ev-size (total bytes size) %i\n\r", ev->size);
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < (ev->vsize); i++) {
> SysIOVec b = ev->iov[i];
> ErlDrvBinary* binv = ev->binv[i];
> if (binv == NULL) {
> printf("ev->binv[%i] = null\n\r", i);
> } else {
> printf("ev->binv[%i]->orig_size = %ld\n\r", i, binv->orig_size);
> }
> printf("ev->iov[%i]->iov_len = %i\n\r", i, b.iov_len);
> int j;
> for (j=0; j < b.iov_len; j++) {
> printf("ev->iov[%i]->iov_base[%i] = %i\n\r", i, j, b.iov_base
> [j]);
> }
> }
> fun = &async_iovectest;
> }
>
> static void example_ready_async(ErlDrvData handle, ErlDrvThreadData
> async_data)
> {
> example_data* d = (example_data*)handle;
> example_async_data* the_async_data = (example_async_data*)async_data;
> ErlDrvTermData spec[] = {
> ERL_DRV_PORT, driver_mk_port(d->port),
> ERL_DRV_ATOM, driver_mk_atom("ok"),
> ERL_DRV_TUPLE, 2 };
> driver_output_term(d->port, spec, sizeof(spec) / sizeof(spec[0]));
> driver_free(the_async_data);
> }
>
> ErlDrvEntry example_driver_entry = {
> NULL, /* F_PTR init, N/A */
> example_drv_start, /* L_PTR start, called when port is opened */
> example_drv_stop, /* F_PTR stop, called when port is closed */
> NULL, /* F_PTR output, called when erlang has sent */
> NULL, /* F_PTR ready_input, called when input descriptor ready */
> NULL, /* F_PTR ready_output, called when output descriptor ready */
> "iovec_drv", /* char *driver_name, the argument to open_port */
> NULL, /* finish */
> NULL, /* handle */
> NULL, /* control */
> NULL, /* timeout */
> example_drv_outputv, /* outputv */
> example_ready_async,
> NULL, /* flush */
> NULL, /* call */
> NULL /* event */
> };
> DRIVER_INIT(example_drv) /* must match name in driver_entry */ {
> return &example_driver_entry;
> }
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ** iovec.erl **
> -module(iovec).
>
> -export([start/1, init/1, test/0]).
>
> -define(DRIVER, iovec_drv).
>
> test() ->
> ok = start(?DRIVER),
> timer:sleep(100), % HACK: give process some time to start and
> load .so
> Port = init(?DRIVER),
> test(Port).
>
> start(SharedLib) ->
> case erl_ddll:load_driver(".", SharedLib) of
> ok -> ok;
> {error, already_loaded} -> ok;
> Error -> exit({error, could_not_load_driver, Error})
> end.
>
> init(SharedLib) ->
> Port = open_port({spawn, SharedLib}, [binary]),
> Port.
>
> test(Port) ->
> true = port_command(Port, encode()),
> receive
> {Port, ok} ->
> io:format("ok!~n", []);
> {'EXIT', Port, Reason} ->
> io:format("~p ~n", [Reason]),
> exit(port_terminated)
> end.
>
> encode() ->
> [1,<<2,3,4>>,5,6|<<7,8>>].
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ** build_iovec **
> cc -no-cpp-precomp -fPIC -fno-common -bundle -flat_namespace -
> undefined suppress -I/usr/local/lib/erlang/usr/include -o
> iovec_drv.so complex.c iovec_driver.c && erlc +debug_info iovec.erl
> && erl +A 32 -s iovec test
>
> Thanks,
> - Reto
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 3:42 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> > What you really want to do can not be done (as far as I know)
> > but you might get it done with some tricks...
> >
> > To avoid copying your driver must implement the
> > ->outputv() entry point and you must send it I/O lists
> > being lists of binaries (might even be an improper list,
> > that is a binary in the tail). You will have to map
> > your tuples into that.
> >
> > If you send [1,<<2,3,4>>,5,6|<<7,8>>] to the driver,
> > void (*outputv)(ErlDrvData drv_data, ErlIOVec *ev) will get:
> >
> > ev->iov[0].iov_len = 1;
> > ev->iov[0].iov_base -> {1};
> > ev->binv[0] = NULL;
> > ev->iov[1].iov_len = 3;
> > ev->iov[1].iov_base -> ev->binv[1]->orig_bytes;
> > ev->binv[1]->orig_size = 3;
> > ev->binv[1]->orig_bytes = {2,3,4};
> > ev->iov[2].iov_len = 2;
> > ev->iov[2].iov_base -> {5,6};
> > ev->binv[2] = NULL;
> > ev->iov[3].iov_len = 2;
> > ev->iov[3].iov_base -> ev->binv[3]->orig_bytes;
> > ev->binv[3]->orig_size = 2;
> > ev->binv[3]->orig_bytes = {7,8};
> >
> > approximately, excuse my syntax :-)
> >
> > Binaries will be binaries and intermediate bytes
> > will be loose vectors. If your driver wants to
> > hang on to the data, it will have to use the
> > reference count in the binary to avoid premature freeing.
> >
> > To send data back without copying your driver will
> > have to use driver_outputv() and it arrives to erlang as
> > a header list of integers followed by a list of
> > binaries. Conversion to tuple format will have to
> > be done in erlang.
> >
> > Keep on dreaming...
> >
> >
> >
> > Have a look at efile_drv.c in the sources...
> >
> >
> >
> > rlenglet@REDACTED (Romain Lenglet) writes:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have the following need: I want to wrap C functions in Erlang.
> >> Those functions get big binaries as input parameters, and return
> >> big binaries, among other kinds of data.
> >> For efficiency, I would like to avoid to copy those binaries
> >> around when communicating. Therefore, I am forced to implement a
> >> C port driver, since this is the only available mechanism that
> >> does not create a separate system process (and hence does not
> >> require inter-process data copy when communicating).
> >>
> >> If I needed only to send one binary in every message, that would
> >> be OK, e.g.:
> >>
> >> % in Erlang:
> >> Binary = <<...>>,
> >> port_command(Port, Binary),
> >>
> >> // in the C port implem:
> >> void myoutput(ErlDrvData drv_data, char *buf, int len) {
> >> ...
> >> }
> >>
> >> I guess that the Binary is not copied, and its data in the Erlang
> >> heap is directly pointed by the *buf argument.
> >> By the way, is that true??? Sending binaries that way is what is
> >> done in prim_inet for sending IP data, so I guess that no copy
> >> is done here.
> >>
> >>
> >> However, I want to send and receive more complex data, which must
> >> be manipulated by the driver, typically a tuple of simple terms
> >> and binaries (which may be large), e.g. the tuple:
> >> Tuple = {ContextHandle, QopReq, Message}
> >> %% ContextHandle = small binary()
> >> %% QopReq = integer() | atom()
> >> %% Message = large binary()
> >>
> >> Such a tuple cannot be passed to port_command(Port, Tuple), since
> >> it is not an IO list. And if I encode it into a binary, by
> >> calling encode(Tuple), I guess that the binaries in the tuple
> >> will get copied in the process (can anybody confirm this?).
> >>
> >>
> >> I have the same problem in the Driver -> Erlang direction, e.g.
> >> to send the tuple:
> >> Tuple = {MajorStatus, MinorStatus, ConfState, QopState,
> >> OutputMessage}
> >> %% MajorStatus = integer()
> >> %% MinorStatus = integer()
> >> %% ConfState = bool()
> >> %% QopState = integer()
> >> %% OutputMessage = large binary()
> >> I hope that using the driver_output_term() C function and the
> >> ErlDrvTermData construction technique, the binary data in the
> >> tuple above will not be copied. Can anybody confirm this?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any clean solution to my problem? Or am I doomed to
> >> write my own BIFs and use my custom erts? Or to send data in
> >> multiple messages, in sequence?
> >>
> >> I dream of a way to extend the BIFs list at runtime, by loading
> >> native libraries dynamically...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Romain LENGLET
> >
> > --
> >
> > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>
--
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list