shootout - nsieve-bits benchmark
Sun Apr 23 19:20:31 CEST 2006
Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB) wrote:
> I noticed that Erlang HiPE times out on the nsieve-bits benchmark.
> That's not very flattering, since the upper limit is 3600 seconds. (:
> I attach a version that uses an ordered_set ets table for a bit array.
> Ruby (assuming that the Pentium 4 box performs at least as well as my
> SunBLADE). It also matches the output of the other implementations (it
> also seems to agree with Doug Bagley's old sieve program, found at
> I haven't submitted it. Does anyone have a better implementation?
A nice challenge. Try the attached file - it's more than twice as fast
as yours. That should put Erlang on the same level as Python and Smalltalk.
"Having users is like optimization: the wise course is to delay it."
-- Paul Graham
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions