EPL vs GPL; was: EUnit 2.0 alpha testers wanted
Sun Apr 23 16:00:54 CEST 2006
Roger Price wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Pupeno wrote:
>> I would hesitate to use a library that is not GPL-compatible ...
> Lots of people assume that since the Mozilla license is not
> GPL-compatible, and since the EPL was inspired by Mozilla, then EPL is not
> compatible with GPL. This may be true under US federal law, but is it
> true under Swedish law? Swedish law and IP practice are different to that
> of the US, and until I hear a Swedish IP lawyer giving an informed legal
> opinion, the question of compatibility for me is still open.
For me, this just means that I have to assume it might not be GPL-compatible.
David Hopwood <>
More information about the erlang-questions