Pluggable syntax transformations (was Re: Erlang vs. Java)

Joel Reymont <>
Fri Sep 9 10:19:54 CEST 2005


Richard,

Care to post some examples? And why do you think Erlang does not need  
them as much?

     Thanks, Joel

On Sep 9, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:

> Erlang has had pluggable used-defined transformation for a long time.
> I guess it just doesn't need it as much.
>





More information about the erlang-questions mailing list