Shell prompt

orbitz <>
Sat Sep 3 20:14:52 CEST 2005


Well I hate to not really answer your question but, why is not having a 
shell so important to this?  You are going to enter data and get data 
back regardless so what differences does alittle prompt make?

On Sep 3, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:

> No, the -noshell option starts no shell, while I need one, just 
> silent. I need to be able to enter things as usual, and I neet to 
> receive any printouts from for example erlang:display or error:logger.
>
> /Vlad
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <>
>> Do you mean:
>> erl -noshell
>> ?
>>
>>> I would like to make the default shell quiet, i.e. not print a 
>>> prompt. From
>>> what I see in the code, I would need to hack either shell.erl or 
>>> user.erl,
>>> which I am reluctant to do (not that it's difficult, but there's 
>>> already
>>> many modules that I need to hack for erlide :-)
>>>
>>> Is there a way that I missed?
>




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list