quoting
Thomas Lindgren
thomasl_erlang@REDACTED
Wed Nov 30 16:50:19 CET 2005
--- "Joe Armstrong (AL/EAB)"
<joe.armstrong@REDACTED> wrote:
> Comments:
>
> 1) printing binaries <<"...">> properly has had a
> strange effect on my programming
> I now use them far more than I ever did before -
> this is because they get printed
> nicely - I think I was often using atoms just
> because I could see them when my
> program failed.
I think printing binaries in a string-like manner is
very handy. Please do introduce it, OTP.
> IMHO we need a character type - so we can
> distinguish $a from 97.
Richard O'Keefe's postings here on the topic of modern
character sets have made me realize this is not a
trivial issue, alas.
> A small number of well-chosen primitive on binaries
> would be very useful.
Yes.
> Somebody else can tell the list what these should
> be - and how yecc and leex can make use of
> them :-)
My lex.erl in jungerl can already do lexing over
binaries (it works for the examples I have tried, at
least). Only 8-bit characters though. I haven't
measured how this compares to lexing over lists. The
"lex driver" can probably be optimized a bit in both
cases.
Best,
Thomas
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list