geometric memory growth
Matthias Lang
matthias@REDACTED
Sat Nov 26 17:40:49 CET 2005
Ulf Wiger writes:
> Forgive me, but I can't help thinking that an exception
> when the fun is applied would be the wrong place, rather
> than when the fun is instantiated.
This seems like madness.
Do you think that f() should print "humpty":
f() ->
Y = atom,
F = fun(X) -> io:fwrite("humpty\n"), X#state.channel end,
F(Y).
Should g() _always_ cause an exception:
g() ->
Y = atom,
F = fun(X) ->
case mymod:myfunc() of
nice -> nice;
nasty -> X#state.channel
end,
F(Y).
What about h():
h() ->
Y = atom,
F = fun(X) ->
case mymod:myfunc() of
nice -> nice;
nasty -> element(3, X)
end,
F(Y).
Matthias
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list