try without catch
Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)
Wed Nov 16 08:52:20 CET 2005
Nick Linker wrote:
> Maybe I didn't understant the idea, but if you intend to add "catch"
> later, why don't write
> case Expr of
> Result -> Action
Yes, of course, but part of the reason was to see whether
it worked as described in the manual. ;-)
The 'of', 'catch' and 'after' parts of the try statement
are all optional, so
try Expr of
Result -> Action
should have been allowed (and it was - by the compiler).
More information about the erlang-questions