beating mnesia to death (was RE: Using 4Gb of ram with Erlang VM)
Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)
Wed Nov 9 00:00:02 CET 2005
To sum up my experiences on the 16 GB machine:
- 64-bit erlang seems to work like a charm
- I stored 70 million records in a table in
one benchmark (15 GB of RAM usage), and
built a 5-million record replicated disc_copies
table in another. Everything worked pretty
much as expected, which was more than I
expected, actually(*). ;-)
- Loading 5 million records from disk took about
27 seconds; loading over the network took
about as long. Building the table from
scratch took over two hours.
- I ran 6 million simultaneous processes; 20 M
when I used hibernate/3. Spawn and send times
My main gripe is that erlang terms take up
a huge amount of space on the heap, e.g.
16 bytes per character in a string -- not
particularly sexy. In order to get large
amounts of data in there, you pretty much
have to use binaries.
(*) I know that OTP doesn't have this type
of hardware in their lab, so this stuff isn't
really tested before release. Nice then to see
that it works exactly as advertised.
More information about the erlang-questions