Thu Mar 17 16:42:20 CET 2005
--- James Hague <james.hague@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hmmm...makes me wonder if cdr-coding (or the like)
> would help out.
> It's traditionally not done in in Lisp systems,
> because you can modify
> existing cons cells in Lisp. But not in Erlang.
> You'd lose tag bits,
> though, which is a huge deal. I'd bet that someone
> looked into this a
> long time back :)
Not that I know of, at least. (Well, vague hand-waving
apart.) In my opinion, after having read most of
what's been published on the topic, cdr coding is both
quite interesting and quite a mess to implement. We
might call it the femme fatale of language hackers?(*)
(*) Actually, I'd nominate compile-time reuse for that
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the erlang-questions