Tue Mar 15 13:13:29 CET 2005
Shouldn't we turn it around then and have
the "static"/"normal functions" in the ordinary export list and
make a new list for the paramterized functions?
What do you think of the other suggestion, removing the
autogenerated new/lenght(Params) and letting the coder
call a bif when (s)he wants to create a new parameterized module?
So we can overload the "constructor" function.
Richard Carlsson writes:
> Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > I.e. I want to have functions that can be called without being
> > parameterized (sp?).
> Yes, my intention was that you should be able to write
> -static([f/1, g/2]).
> but I never got around to implementing it. (It should be
> rather easy, though.)
More information about the erlang-questions