An "is_string" BIF?
Fri Mar 11 23:53:45 CET 2005
Dominic Williams wrote:
> I like guards the way they are.
It is good to know you are a hard-core Erlang afficionado, but if
the semantics of guards were as simple as the translation you describe
below, there would not be a need to have guards in the first place.
> > ... making it impossible to use abstractions there, e.g.
> > glorbgraph(Graph) when mygraph:curiousproperty(Graph) -> ...
> glorbgraph(Graph) ->
> glorbgraph(Graph, mygraph:curiousproperty(Graph)).
> glorbgraph(Graph,true) ->
> glorbgraph(Graph,false) ->
More information about the erlang-questions