Poll: Packages use
Sun Mar 6 19:46:27 CET 2005
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thierry Mallard" <>
>> * Should the use of packages become widespread, would it be useful to
>> adopt some naming scheme so that package name clashes are avoided?
> Something like Java naming convention ( org.erlang.package ) ?
That was my first thought too, but it feels a little clumsy.
> Another option would be to make something like a service-tree :
I think that might be a better idea. Not everything is a service, of course,
and the Java structure does have the advantage that it makes the top levels
> BTW, great job for Erlide, even in its current state : It really
> demonstrate the possibilities of an integrated multi-OS plateform, IMHO.
Thank you for the kind words. So far, it's been nice to be able to
concentrate on whatever I felt like for, but soon there will be long lists
of bug reports ;-)
More information about the erlang-questions