Licensing of documentation
Tue Jun 28 10:52:09 CEST 2005
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Joe Armstrong (AL/EAB) wrote:
> > "Concurrent Programming in Erlang - Part 1". Is this true ?
> Yes. Prentice hall retain the copyright by they have allowed
> us to freely distribute part I of the book.
> As regards the Erlang reference manual the latest version is 5.4.8 and it has an
> explicit copyright.
> It should be part of the open source Erlang release and as such be covered by
> the Erlang public License.
> It is the intention that everything on the erlang.org web site is covered by the
> Erlang Public License - otherwise it would not be on the site
Hello Joe, Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking about publishing
a work derived from the distributed documentation, and licensed under GNU
GPL http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html or FDL
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html; but I understand now that this is
The Erlang Public License (derived from the Mozilla Public License) is
incompatible with GNU GPL/FDL according to the Free Software Foundation
More information about the erlang-questions