ex11, plotting and Cairo ...
Wed Jul 20 12:03:38 CEST 2005
(Enters scene with proverbial oar)
Although you are rightly concerned about portability, I really liked
ex11 because it _removed_ many layers between application code and
graphics, cutting out a lot of sloooow ugly crap between the two.
Considering this, why not attack the MS-Windows GDI directly in Erlang,
maybe with a k.i.s.s. C driver to ease the connection? As far as I'm
aware there are essentially only two low-level graphics APIs that cover
99.997% of computers: MS-Windows GDI and MIT-X11.
Furthermore, with Erlang distribution you gain the advantage of a
graphics API for Windows that is network oriented, like X11. Believe me,
I sorely miss the client-server architecture of X11 when working on
MS-Windows. I install Cygwin-X11 within minutes!
I'm not claiming it's easy, but ex11 supplemented with "eGDI" would be a
solid foundation for concurrency-oriented graphics. Keep the middle and
upper layers written in Erlang and have just two low-layer protocols to
choose from, possibly switched automagically according to OS.
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:11 +0200, Joe Armstrong (AL/EAB) wrote:
> What fun. As regards graphics in Erlang the situation is still a
> I see things the problem is more one of "programming models" than
> an Erlang interface to X (replace X by your favourite package).
"The Tao of Programming
flows far away
on the wind of morning."
More information about the erlang-questions