Meyer, OO and concurrency
Thu Jul 14 21:29:58 CEST 2005
David Hopwood wrote:
> Nothing, *for this example*. But if the semaphore (or any other kind of
> concurrency construct) were provided by a language, then the language
> have a lot to do with it.
If it were provided by the language how would a latency guarantee be
possible given the language doesn't control the CPU? This one weak spot
in erlang's process approach.
BTW, anyone know if ruby will adopt erlang's approach? That would be
More information about the erlang-questions