Parsing null terminated strings in a binary.
Raimo Niskanen
raimo@REDACTED
Thu Jan 13 12:14:35 CET 2005
... and this actually compiles and works:
[code]
z_split(B, N) ->
case B of
<<B1:N/binary,0,B2/binary>> ->
{B1,B2};
<<_:N/binary>>=B ->
B;
<<_:N/binary,_/binary>>=B ->
z_split(B, N+1)
end.
[/code]
Eshell V5.4.3 (abort with ^G)
1> t:z_split(<<61,62,63,0,64,65,66>>, 0).
{<<61,62,63>>,
<<64,65,66>>}
2> t:z_split(<<61,62,63,0,64>>, 0).
{<<61,62,63>>,
<<64>>}
3> t:z_split(<<61,62,63,0>>, 0).
{<<61,62,63>>,
<<>>}
4> t:z_split(<<61,62,63>>, 0).
<<61,62,63>>
Raimo Niskanen <raimo@REDACTED> writes:
> Parse the binary in a loop something like this (untested):
>
> z_split(<<B1:N/binary,0,B2/binary>>, N) ->
> {B1,B2};
> z_split(<<B1:N/binary>>, N) ->
> B1;
> z_split(<<_:N/binary,_/binary>>=B, N) ->
> z_split(B, N+1).
>
> This will not build any sub-binaries until the zero is found.
>
>
>
> cyberlync@REDACTED (Eric Merritt) writes:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I have a need to parse out a series of null terminated fields a
> > binary. The easiest way to do this is to simply traverse the binary
> > using bit syntax until a null byte occurs. However, I believe this
> > would be less then efficient as a new binary would be created for each
> > byte matched. Aside from created a C port to actually do the parsing
> > do any of you have any ideas on how to do this efficiently?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> > --
> > I'm a programmer, I don't have to spell correctly; I just have to
> > spell consistently
>
> --
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
--
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list