Backtrack
Jani Launonen
jabba@REDACTED
Wed Jan 12 16:49:15 CET 2005
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Mickael Remond wrote:
> Tiago Rodrigues Antao wrote:
>> As far as I can see Erlang has no concept of parameters that are both
>> input/output and of backtrack. Am I wrong?
>
> No. You are right. The syntax of Erlang comes from Prolog, but the language
> feature are different.
>
> Regarding inference, maybe the rule engine ERES, found in the Exat Agent
> platform could be usefull to you (See:
> http://www.diit.unict.it/users/csanto/exat/whats.html)
>
> --
> Mickaël Rémond
> http://www.erlang-projects.org/
I've kept my eye on Mercury --- a hybrid of functional and logic
programming language. The Mercury has an experimental implicit parallelism
implemented (got it? :)) and one can read it about at
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/information/papers.html#conway-thesis
The main site is at
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/
It might be interesting for you. At least the implicit parallelism is
interesting for me as the CMP/SMT -processors are coming.
Have a nice read :)
-+-+-+-
Jani Launonen
Student. . . . . . . . . .University of Oulu, Dept. of El. & Inf. Eng.
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making future plans."
- Alfred E. Neuman
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list