No more EVA?

[Niclas Eklund]

Hi!

No, you're not the only one. See for example http://www.3gpp.org/.

The application cosTime supports similar functionality as Eva. You should
also look into cosNotification (alt. cosEvent), which is used by 3GPP to
handle Events/Alarms.

/Nick

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Casper wrote:

> Kenneth,
> 
> Thanks for the advice.
> 
> Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
> Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?
> 
> Cheers,
> Eranga
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth@REDACTED] 
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:32 PM
> To: Casper
> Cc: 'Erlang-Questions@REDACTED Org'
> Subject: RE: No more EVA?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The other event and alarm solution is part of a product we have
> (written in Erlang) and is not that easy to extract as a separate generic 
> application. I meant that we (Erlang/OTP developers at Ericsson) could
> extract that
> solution and include it in OTP when and if interest is big enough.
> We do not have that in our current plans for what to do during 2005.
> 
> /Regards Kenneth
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Casper [mailto:casper2000a@REDACTED]
> > Sent: den 10 januari 2005 05:39
> > To: 'Kenneth Lundin'
> > Cc: 'Erlang-Questions@REDACTED Org'
> > Subject: RE: No more EVA?
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Kenneth,
> > 
> > Thanks for your advice.
> > 
> > I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
> > it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you
> can
> > advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so
> I
> > can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
> > any use.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Eranga
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth@REDACTED] 
> > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
> > To: Erlang-Questions@REDACTED Org; casper2000a@REDACTED; Casper
> > Subject: Re: No more EVA?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
> > - we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
> > - we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
> > after the decision)
> > - Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
> > changes
> >   in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody
> is
> > using it.
> > - There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
> > some day if
> >   the interest is big enough.
> > - If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B , 
> > do some minor corrections
> > and run it together with the rest of R10B.
> > 
> > /Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)