Proposed change to libraries

Carsten Schultz <>
Mon Feb 7 22:22:11 CET 2005


On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Bjorn Gustavsson wrote:
> Unfortunately, it is tricky to check that {M,F} is a valid fun. The module
> M might not even be loaded.

I do not see this as a grave problem.  It might be handled as if the
programmer had written   fun(X) -> M:F(X) end   instead.

> It has been suggested earlier that we should add
>         fun M:F/Arity
> to the language.

Or this :-)

Take care,


Carsten Schultz (2:38, 33:47)
PGP/GPG key on the key servers, 
fingerprint on my home page.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list