MIB compilation problem

Rachwal Waldemar-AWR001 <>
Wed Dec 21 18:50:13 CET 2005


Did you mean to move the whole OBJECT-GROUP after the last OBJECT-TYPE
definition?
This doesn't help giving the same error report. :(
WR.

-----Original Message-----
From: Micael Karlberg [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 6:32 PM
To: Rachwal Waldemar-AWR001
Subject: Re: MIB compilation problem

The group has to be defined after the OID. The '[99,99]' is just some
"funny thing" the compiler comes up with to make every thing stop...

/BMK

Rachwal Waldemar-AWR001 wrote:
> I get strange errors while compiling the MIB as attached. Other MIBs 
> with similar construct passed the compilation. Is there anything in 
> this MIB I can't see? Other suspicious thing is the last error message

> with OBJECT IDENTIFIER '[99,99]' - no idea where such numbers come
from.
> Regards,
> Waldemar.
> 
> 
>>erlc +'{group_check,false}' NO-OID.mib
> 
> 
> NO-OID.mib: 29: Error: OBJECT IDENTIFIER defined in terms of undefined

> parent object. Parent: 'cmpMethodExtensionGroup'.(Sub-indexes: [1].)
> NO-OID.mib: 36: Error: OBJECT IDENTIFIER defined in terms of undefined

> parent object. Parent: 'cmpMethodExtensionGroup'.(Sub-indexes: [2].)
> NO-OID.mib: 44: Error: OBJECT IDENTIFIER defined in terms of undefined

> parent object. Parent: 'cmpMethodExtensionGroup'.(Sub-indexes: [3].)
> NO-OID.mib: 51: Error: OBJECT IDENTIFIER defined in terms of undefined

> parent object. Parent: 'cmpMethodExtensionGroup'.(Sub-indexes: [4].)
> NO-OID.mib: Error: Multiple used object with OBJECT IDENTIFIER 
> '[99,99]'. Used in 'cmpMethodExtMethodName' and
'cmpMethodExtObjectIn'.
> 
> --



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list